![]() |
|||
| http://www.illinoisfamily.org | |||
|
Arne Duncan and "Comprehensive" Sex Ed
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
By Laurie Higgins, DSA Director
- Illinois Family Institute
Perhaps Arne Duncan's appointment as Secretary of Education is a good time to revisit the wisdom, ethics, pedagogical soundness, and efficacy of comprehensive sex education-yet another misnomer in the field of education. In 2006, under Arne Duncan's leadership, Chicago Public Schools, adopted comprehensive sex education curricula. According to the Windy City Times, "On April 26, the Chicago Board of Education unanimously passed the Family Life and Comprehensive Sexual Health Education policy submitted by Chicago Public School ( CPS ) administrators, according to a press release from the Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health ( ICAH ). . . . A CPS task force worked with youth leaders from around the city who were affiliated with ICAH to shape the policy." The Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health held its Spring 2006 fundraiser at the Playboy mansion, which is understandable because who cares more deeply about sexual ethics than Hugh Hefner and his daughter Honorary Event Chair Christie Hefner. Educators, with their voracious appetites for the hearts and minds of other people's children, continue to gobble up increasing areas of life. Their apparently insatiable hunger to remake the world in their own image blinds them to the arrogance of their quest. And their manipulation of rhetoric blinds taxpayers to the inappropriateness of both their means and ends. "Comprehensive sex education" is education-speak for sex education curricula that, among other things, teach students subversive views of sexual conduct, abortion, and homosexuality. Here are some of the topics covered in typical comprehensive sex ed curricula: However did society arrive at the foolish conclusion that anything pertaining to sexuality is the proper purview of public educators? How did the government arrive at the hubristic notion that it should expound in any way on a topic that for people of diverse religious faiths is inherently, profoundly, and objectively spiritual? The government is expressly prohibited from entangling itself with religion, then it decides to teach students about a topic that for many is deeply, fundamentally, and inextricably religious. What follows is a list of the top ten things a teen should do before they become sexually active according to "sexuality educator" Karen Rayne: As a sexuality educator, I spend most of my time helping parents understand how to talk with their children and teenagers about sex, sexuality, gender, and all of the myriad issues that go along with those things. . . . Putting aside issues of whether parents should have substantial input and control over their teenager's sexual activities, I found that parents were relying on goals that were far too vague. . . . And so, my list of ten concrete things that teenagers need to do before they have sex was born. Just to be clear, these are things to do before you have oral sex, sexual intercourse, or anything else that could get you pregnant or an STD.Illinois Family Institute has a counter-cultural concrete suggestion for all parents of children in public schools: for just health class, homeschool your children. Health class is usually a one semester class taken by sophomores. I know from my eight years of working in a public high school and from putting four children through a public high school that many, probably most, high school students think of health class as a "blow-off" course. Students are familiar with much of the content already, from drug, alcohol, and tobacco use to nutrition and exercise to mental health issues. That leaves sexual matters, and for many parents of faith, information regarding sexuality should never be taught divorced from discussions of faith and morality. Moreover, co-ed sex education classes further undermine the virtue of modesty that our culture is doing a remarkable job already of undermining. Modesty is not to be confused with shame or prudery. Separating adolescent boys from adolescent girls for discussions of sexuality reinforces the idea that sexual activity and sexual anatomy are intimate and private. Co-ed classroom discussions about breast development, menstruation, erections, nocturnal emissions, anal sex, oral sex, and masturbation only serve to break down natural sexual barriers of modesty that cultural institutions should be strengthening. In 1998, two of my daughter's friends, who were sixteen years old at the time, told me that it was not uncommon for groups of boys and girls to talk about their masturbation experiences together at school, asking one another whether they masturbate or how often. These girls were not part of a "wild" or unusually rebellious crowd. Although I was shocked, I later realized that if their health class permits and encourages discussions about sexual activity, then why would they not continue those discussions outside of class. IFI is not recommending parents ignore this critical topic. IFI is recommending that parents notify their schools that they will be homeschooling their children just for health class. There are myriad curricula available from which to choose and which students would be able to complete in far less time than a school health class would take. This would not involve pulling them out of school. Students could complete this work during their evenings or on weekends and have an extra free period during their school day. Perhaps if enough parents opt to homeschool their students for health class, the decline in enrollment, which would in turn affect staffing, would lead public school administrators to rethink the wisdom of co-ed comprehensive sex education curricula. If, however, enrollment is little affected and schools maintain co-ed comprehensive sex education curricula, at least those parents who opt their children out will have escaped yet another attempt at indoctrination. Support IFI's New Division of School Advocacy! Would you prayerfully consider pledging a monthly gift of $25 or more to support this new division of IFI? A promise of this kind will help us form a strategic plan that budgetary constraints often makes impossible. You can become a Sustaining Member with automatic monthly deductions from your checking account or credit card. Click HERE to access the Sustaining Member form.If a monthly pledge is not feasible at this time, perhaps you could send a one-time, tax-deductible gift. Click HERE to donate today! If you believe in the mission and purpose of Illinois Family Institute, please send your most generous contribution today. IFI is supported by voluntary donations from individuals like you across the state of Illinois. Donations to IFI are tax-deductible. | |||